WCAG 2.2 AA Audit
A full audit against the standard nearly every accessibility claim references, covering your highest-traffic and highest-risk templates rather than one sample page.
Digital accessibility claims keep climbing, and most businesses targeted had no idea they were exposed. We audit, fix, and document, so your site works for every customer and you can show the work.
Mediaology's Accessibility & ADA Compliance service covers WCAG 2.2 AA audit, manual keyboard & screen reader testing, prioritized remediation plan, Code-Level fixes, accessibility statement, and ongoing monitoring & Re-Testing. Digital accessibility claims keep climbing, and most businesses targeted had no idea they were exposed.
of our audit is automated scanning. It’s fast and it finds real defects, but it can only evaluate what a machine can measure, which is why a clean scan is not a compliant site.
is manual testing: navigating your site by keyboard alone and listening to it through a screen reader, which is how the barriers that actually block people get found.
goes to documentation, a dated conformance report and remediation record, which is what matters most if a demand letter ever arrives.
Around one in four US adults lives with a disability. Accessibility work widens the audience that can actually use your site, and in the process reduces one of the more common and avoidable legal exposures a business carries online.
The standard nearly every claim references is WCAG, the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, at level AA. We audit against it directly: automated scans first, then manual testing with a keyboard and a screen reader, because the failures that matter most to real users are usually the ones no scanner can detect.
Then we fix. Contrast, focus states, alt text, form labels, heading structure, and keyboard traps get remediated in your actual code, not hidden behind an overlay widget. You get a prioritized report, the fixes shipped, and an accessibility statement you can publish. For sites that change often, we re-test on a schedule so new content doesn’t quietly reintroduce old problems.
A full audit against the standard nearly every accessibility claim references, covering your highest-traffic and highest-risk templates rather than one sample page.
Your site navigated by keyboard alone and heard through a screen reader, which surfaces the blocking issues automated tools structurally cannot detect.
Every finding ranked by severity and effort and mapped to the specific WCAG criterion, so you can see what’s urgent, what’s cosmetic, and what each fix takes.
Remediation in your real markup and CSS (contrast, focus indicators, alt text, form labels, headings, and keyboard traps), rather than an overlay script layered on top.
A published statement documenting your conformance level, known limitations, and how someone can report a barrier, expected practice, and evidence of good-faith effort.
Scheduled re-tests so new pages, plugins, and uploaded content don’t quietly undo the work. Most regressions arrive through routine content updates.
The one-line scripts marketed as instant compliance have themselves been named in a large share of recent accessibility lawsuits rather than preventing them. We fix the underlying code, which is the only remediation that holds up.
Automated tools are the starting point, never the finish line. The barriers that genuinely stop someone from booking or buying are usually found by a person navigating without a mouse.
A dated audit, a remediation record, and a published statement demonstrate good-faith effort. That paper trail is often what matters most when a complaint arrives.
Proper headings, labels, alt text, and contrast are the same signals search engines and AI assistants use to parse a page. Accessible sites tend to be more legible to machines, too.
Best for project briefs, scope questions, and longer conversations.
Reach our Detroit team Mon–Fri, 9 AM to 6 PM Eastern.
Free 30-minute consultation. We'll review your site live and identify quick wins.
Browse recent builds and the standards we hold them to.
What businesses ask when they first realize their site might be exposed.
In the US, courts have widely applied the ADA to the websites of businesses open to the public, and most claims reference WCAG at level AA as the practical benchmark. Obligations vary by sector and jurisdiction, and we’re not a law firm, for a definitive answer on what applies to you, talk to your attorney. What we can tell you is precisely where your site currently fails the standard those claims cite.
No, and they often make things worse. Overlays sit on top of inaccessible code instead of fixing it, frequently interfere with the assistive technology a user has already configured, and have appeared in a large number of lawsuits against the very sites that installed them.
Most audits take one to two weeks, depending on how many unique page templates you have. Remediation depends on what we find, a well-built site might need a few days of fixes, while an older one with deep structural problems takes considerably longer. You get the prioritized plan first, so you decide what to fix and when.
No. Findings are ranked by severity, so you can address the barriers that actually block people first and schedule the rest. A documented, in-progress remediation plan is meaningfully better than nothing at all.
Rarely in ways your customers would notice. Most fixes are structural: labels, headings, focus indicators, alt text. The one visible change that sometimes comes up is color contrast, and where a brand color fails we’ll propose an accessible variant rather than quietly altering your palette.
Accessibility drifts. New pages, plugins, and uploaded images reintroduce issues, so we re-test on a schedule and flag regressions. Sites that publish frequently benefit most from ongoing monitoring.
We’ll audit your highest-traffic pages against WCAG 2.2 AA and show you what’s failing, how serious each issue is, and what it takes to fix.